<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Muth&#8217;s Truths: January 23, 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muthstruths.com/2010/01/23/muths-truths-january-23-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muthstruths.com/2010/01/23/muths-truths-january-23-2010/</link>
	<description>No better political friend; no worse political enemy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:53:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony M Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.muthstruths.com/2010/01/23/muths-truths-january-23-2010/#comment-3366</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony M Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 06:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muthstruths.com/?p=949#comment-3366</guid>
		<description>Anthony Wright says:
May 15, 2010 at 11:03 pm
The NV Bar makes her pay the escalated bar dues of a five-year lawyer. The state bar seems to think Candaleria has five years behind her to make her pay the higher annual dues. If the policing body for lawyers thinks 39 months equals 60 months, then how can attorneys who are punished if they do not pay the dues say otherwise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony Wright says:<br />
May 15, 2010 at 11:03 pm<br />
The NV Bar makes her pay the escalated bar dues of a five-year lawyer. The state bar seems to think Candaleria has five years behind her to make her pay the higher annual dues. If the policing body for lawyers thinks 39 months equals 60 months, then how can attorneys who are punished if they do not pay the dues say otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RepUGHlican</title>
		<link>http://www.muthstruths.com/2010/01/23/muths-truths-january-23-2010/#comment-2633</link>
		<dc:creator>RepUGHlican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muthstruths.com/?p=949#comment-2633</guid>
		<description>How about the fact that this Carl Bunce CAN&#039;T BE APPOINTED to his position, CCRP Committee members have to vote on the new grassroots coalition leader??  What exactly are they using the bylaws for, lining the litterbox??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the fact that this Carl Bunce CAN&#8217;T BE APPOINTED to his position, CCRP Committee members have to vote on the new grassroots coalition leader??  What exactly are they using the bylaws for, lining the litterbox??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lu</title>
		<link>http://www.muthstruths.com/2010/01/23/muths-truths-january-23-2010/#comment-2540</link>
		<dc:creator>Lu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muthstruths.com/?p=949#comment-2540</guid>
		<description>Erick Erickson, &#039;a man with impeccable credentials among movement conservatives in both Washington, DC, and nationally&#039;??    Can&#039;t be conservative if he backs Tarkanian.  Didn&#039;t he get the message about who Tarkanian supported (Shelley Berkley...liberal anti-gun).   And what about his being supported by the Brady Law people?   Nothing conservative about that!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick Erickson, &#8216;a man with impeccable credentials among movement conservatives in both Washington, DC, and nationally&#8217;??    Can&#8217;t be conservative if he backs Tarkanian.  Didn&#8217;t he get the message about who Tarkanian supported (Shelley Berkley&#8230;liberal anti-gun).   And what about his being supported by the Brady Law people?   Nothing conservative about that!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

