Connect
To Top

If It Walks Like a Socialist and Talks Like a Socialist…

FOX News yakker Bill O’Reilly says Barack Obama isn’t a socialist. He notes in a recent op/ed that the American Heritage Dictionary defines socialism as a social organization in which the means of distributing and producing goods is owned collectively. “As long as he isn’t nationalizing industry or purloining private property,” O’Reilly wrote, “I don’t think the socialist label is accurate.”

O’Reilly, of course, is dead wrong.

Just because Obama hasn’t SUCCEEDED (yet) in nationalizing industry or purloining private property, doesn’t mean he doesn’t harbor those desires. Just look at what he’s attempted to do to the U.S. auto, banking and health care industries. I mean, by O’Reilly’s standard, Ron Paul isn’t a conservative/libertarian because he hasn’t yet succeeded in shrinking government.

Look, if President Obama had his way, the government would control the means of distributing and producing health care in America (as well as cars and banking). And he would purloin money from each and every one of us to pay for it by mandating that every American buy health insurance.

He’s a socialist

Disclaimer

This blog/website is written and paid for by…me, Chuck Muth, a United States citizen. I publish my opinions under the rights afforded me by the Creator and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as adopted by our Founding Fathers on September 17, 1787 at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania without registering with any government agency or filling out any freaking reports. And anyone who doesn’t like it can take it up with George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin and John Adams the next time you run into each other.

Copyright © 2018 Chuck Muth